Breast Augmentation an Uninsured Procedure

Most women who seek breast augmentation to enlarge their breasts as opposed to reducing them can expect to pay for the procedure out of their pocket. This is not considered a necessary medical procedure, but rather one of aesthetics. Aesthetics and looking attractive have become as valued as health in society today. Breast augmentation can bolster a woman’s self-esteem and give her the confidence she deserves. It may fulfill a lifelong aspiration to look a certain way that brings out an emboldened and self-assured side to a woman nobody has ever seen before. You may be wondering, “how can I obtain breast augmentation financing?”

What are Some Finance Options?

Finance options for breast augmentation are plentiful and vary in type. Some plastic surgeons offer their own financing for the procedure. This ensures that not only their wealthy clients can afford their services, but everyday people can have the advantage of this procedure as well. Several plastic surgeons offer convenient, low interest payment programs that offer better rates than credit card companies. There are amazing options that allow women not to pay interest on the procedure for up to two years! This was unheard of in years past.

Financing companies often offer breast augmentation as a procedure that they are willing to finance. Many allow women to obtain an application for financing over the Internet. A decision can often be reached in a matter of minutes. Certain finance companies will defer payments for a few months and interest rates can be lower if the credit qualifies. Repayment options can vary from one year up to five years in most cases.

Some credit card companies are beginning to see a market for financing such procedures. There are a few that offer finance programs for Healthcare as a line of credit separate from a credit card. These are generally offered with cosmetic surgery in mind and often offer low interest rate and extended payment options. It really helps as a consumer when you can obtain this kind of financing with a fixed, guaranteed rate of interest. Some will waive the interest if the balance is paid off within a shorter time from of one to two years. Credit lines are often granted in amounts as high as $25,000 to cover one or multiple medical procedures.

Cost Associated with Breast Augmentation

The cost associated with breast augmentation can be around a couple of thousand dollars to as high as $25,000. It really depends upon the type of procedure. Also, the price will vary depending on the location of where the procedure takes place and how high the cost of living is in a particular area. The more involved the procedure the higher the expense will be.

Positives to Obtaining Financing

- It allows you to have the breast augmentation now as opposed to later

- There are payback options that are better than using credit loans or even borrowing from family and friends

- You will boost your self-image and feel proud of the results

Many startup companies believe that they do not need a lawyer to help them with their business dealings. In the early stages, this may be true. However, as time goes on and your company grows, you will find yourself in situations where it is necessary to hire a business lawyer and begin to understand all the many benefits that come with hiring a lawyer for your legal needs.

The most straightforward approach to avoid any future legal issues is to employ a startup lawyer who is well-versed in your state’s company regulations and best practices. In addition, working with an attorney can help you better understand small company law. So, how can a startup lawyer help you in ensuring that your company’s launch runs smoothly?

They Know What’s Best for You

Lawyers that have experience with startups usually have worked in prestigious law firms, and as general counsel for significant corporations.

Their strategy creates more efficient, responsive, and, ultimately, more successful solutions – relies heavily on this high degree of broad legal and commercial knowledge.

They prioritize learning about a clients’ businesses and interests and obtaining the necessary outcomes as quickly as feasible.

Also, they provide an insider’s viewpoint and an intelligent methodology to produce agile, creative solutions for their clients, based on their many years of expertise as attorneys and experience dealing with corporations.

They Contribute to the Increase in the Value of Your Business

Startup attorneys help represent a wide range of entrepreneurs, operating companies, venture capital firms, and financiers in the education, fashion, finance, health care, internet, social media, technology, real estate, and television sectors.

They specialize in mergers and acquisitions as well as working with companies that have newly entered a market. They also can manage real estate, securities offerings, and SEC compliance, technology transactions, financing, employment, entertainment and media, and commercial contracts, among other things.

Focusing on success must include delivering the highest levels of representation in resolving the legal and business difficulties confronting clients now, tomorrow, and in the future, based on an unwavering dedication to the firm’s fundamental principles of quality, responsiveness, and business-centric service.

Wrapping Up

All in all, introducing a startup business can be overwhelming. You’re already charged with a host of responsibilities in which you’re untrained as a business owner. Legal problems are notoriously difficult to solve, and interpreting “legalese” is sometimes required. Experienced business lawyers know these complexities and can help you navigate them to avoid stumbling blocks.

Although many company owners wait until the last minute to deal with legal issues, they would benefit or profit greatly from hiring an experienced startup lawyer even before they begin. Reputable startup lawyers can give essential legal guidance, assist entrepreneurs in avoiding legal hazards, and improve their prospects of becoming a successful company.

This startling figure comes from a recent review of the financial advice offered from the big four banks by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC).

Even more startling: 10% of advice was found to leave investors in an even worse financial position.

Through a “vertically integrated business model”, Commonwealth Bank, National Australia Bank, Westpac, ANZ and AMP offer ‘in house’ financial advice, and collectively, control more than half of Australia’s financial planners.

It’s no surprise ASIC’s review found advisers at these banks favoured financial products that connected to their parent company, with 68% of client’s funds invested in ‘in house’ products as oppose to external products that may have been on the firms list.

Why the banks integrated financial advice model is flawed

It’s hard to believe the banks can keep a straight face and say they can abide by the duty for advisers to act absolutely in the best interests of a client.

Under the integrated financial advice model, there are layers of different fees including adviser fees, platform fees and investment management fees adding up to 2.5-3.5%

The typical breakdown of fees is usually as follows: an adviser charge of 0.8% to 1.1%, a platform fee of between 0.4% and 0.8%, and a managed fund fee of between 0.7% and 2.1%. These fees are not only opaque, but are sufficiently high to limit the ability of the client to quickly earn real rates of return.

Layers of fees placed into the business model used by the banks means there is not necessarily an incentive for the financial advice arm to make a profit, because the profits can be made in the upstream parts of the supply chain through the banks promoting their own products.

This business model, however, is flawed, and cannot survive in a world where people are demanding greater accountability for their investments, increased transparency in relation to fees and increased control over their investments.

It is noteworthy that the truly independent financial advisory firms in Australia that offer separately managed accounts have done everything in their power to avoid using managed funds and keep fee’s competitive.

The banks have refused to admit their integrated approach to advice is fatally flawed. When the Australian Financial Review approached the Financial Services Council (FSC), a peak body that represents the ‘for-profit’ wealth managers, for a defence if the layered fee arrangements, a spokesman said no generalisations could be made.

There are fundamental flaws in the advice model, and it will be interesting to see what the upcoming royal commission into banking will do to change some of the contentious issues surround integrated financial advice.

Many financial commentators are calling for a separation of financial advice attached to banks, with obvious bias and failure to meet the best interests of clients becoming more apparent.

Chris Brycki, CEO of Stockspot, says “investors should receive fair and unbiased financial advice from experts who will act in the best interests of their client. What Australians currently get is product pushing from salespeople who are paid by the banks.”

Brycki is calling for structural reform to fix the problems caused by the dominant market power of the banks to ensure that consumers are protected, advisers are better educated and incentives are aligned.

Stockspot’s annual research into high-fee-charging funds shows thousands of customers of banks are being recommended bank aligned investment products despite the potential of more appropriate alternatives being available.